{OT} This was a prediction...

Pretty friggin' close...


http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg

Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:

> Pretty friggin' close...
>
> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg

That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
proportionally to their electoral vote counts:

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg

(from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)

Another such map is here:

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png

Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/

Damned interesting! Thanks for posting....even though you are a LIEbrawl!!

"larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote in message
news:06cda4bb-b225-4346-bf2e-05ad1e34346e@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>
>> Pretty friggin' close...
>>
>> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>
> That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
> according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
> large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
> view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
> proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>
> (from
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>
> Another such map is here:
>
>
> http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>
> Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>
> http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>
>
>

Sharx35 wrote:

> "larry moe 'n curly" <larrymoencurly@my-deja.com> wrote in message
> news:06cda4bb-b225-4346-bf2e-05ad1e34346e@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
> >
> >> Pretty friggin' close...
> >>
> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
> >
> > That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
> > according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
> > large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
> > view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
> > proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
> >
> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
> >
> > (from
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
> >
> > Another such map is here:
> >
> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
> >
> > Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
> >
> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>
> Damned interesting! Thanks for posting....even though you are a LIEbrawl!!
>
I've never been a liberal, and I'm a Republican.

larry moe 'n curly wrote:

>
>
>Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>
>> Pretty friggin' close...
>>
>> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>
>That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
>view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>
> http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>
>(from
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>
>Another such map is here:
>
>
>http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>
>Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>
> http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/

The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.

In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
"badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:

> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
> >
> >> Pretty friggin' close...
> >>
> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
> >
> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
> >
> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
> >
> >(from
> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
> >
> >Another such map is here:
> >
> >
> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
> >
> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
> >
> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>
> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.

I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves me wondering how
bipartisan the obama administration will be.
--


We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism,
but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small
doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find they have Communism."
- Soviet Leader Nikita Khrushchev, 1959

dbu. wrote:

>In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>> >
>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>> >>
>> >>
>>http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more
>>realistic >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which
>>displays states >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>> >
>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>> >
>> >(from
>>
>>>http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...s_2008/7697829
>>.stm) > >Another such map is here:
>> >
>> >
>>
>>>http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...teelecredblue1
>>024.png > >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>> >
>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>
>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban
>>areas that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and
>>now we'll have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>
>I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick
>leaves me wondering how bipartisan the obama administration will be.

Bipartisanship is only when you compromise to them, not the other way
around.

--
“The more things change, the more they remain the same.” ~ Alphonse Karr

On Nov 6, 4:22 am, "dbu." <nos...@nobama.com> wrote:
> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa...@reader.motzarella.org>,
>
>
>
>
>
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>
> > >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>
> > >> Pretty friggin' close...
>
> > >>http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>
> > >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
> > >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
> > >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
> > >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
> > >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>
> > > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>
> > >(from
> > >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>
> > >Another such map is here:
>
> > >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...elecredblue102...
>
> > >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>
> > > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>
> > The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
> > breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
> > that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
> > have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>
> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves me wondering how
> bipartisan the obama administration will be.
> --
>
> We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism,
> but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small
> doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find they have Communism."
> - Soviet Leader Nikita Khrushchev, 1959- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Bipartisan does not mean what you think or wish.

It means the opposite parties views will be taken
into account where deemed appropriate.

After all, the Republicans DID lose the election.

At least try to hold off judgement until he's had
a chance to take over the office. I'd imagine bush
will be providing an interesting education in
current international politics, the parts we don't
get to see.

All your "micro-worries" will wear you out.

dennis
in nca

"dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>> >
>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>> >>
>> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>> >
>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
>> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>> >
>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>> >
>> >(from
>> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>> >
>> >Another such map is here:
>> >
>> >
>> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>> >
>> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>> >
>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>
>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
>> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
>> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>
> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves me
> wondering how
> bipartisan the obama administration will be.
> --
>

Geez! It's only been a day! Chill.

Absolutely, Democrat bipartisanship only extends to the RINOs. It's
about time the Republicans took a similar view of the world.


On Nov 6, 7:35*am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Bipartisanship is only when you compromise to them, not the other way
> around.
>
> --
> The more things change, the more they remain the same. ~ Alphonse Karr- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

In article <tbGQk.240959$4p1.113242@en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com>,
"Truckdude" <sarah@duh.com> wrote:

> "dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
> news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
> > In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
> > "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Pretty friggin' close...
> >> >>
> >> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
> >> >
> >> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
> >> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
> >> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
> >> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
> >> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
> >> >
> >> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
> >> >
> >> >(from
> >> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
> >> >
> >> >Another such map is here:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
> >> >
> >> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
> >> >
> >> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
> >>
> >> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
> >> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
> >> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
> >> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
> >
> > I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves me
> > wondering how
> > bipartisan the obama administration will be.
> > --
> >
>
> Geez! It's only been a day! Chill.

I am chilled. I only made a observation. I'm open minded. The guy
might do fine. As for Rahm, religion plays a part in his life, that it
good and he's a triathlete.



"RAHM EMANUEL, a congressman from Illinois, is often compared to Newt
Gingrich. The head of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is
clever, energetic and utterly determined to win back the House of
Representatives in November. He is also, like the man who led the
Republicans to just such a triumph in 1994, somewhat abrasive. He once
sent a rotting fish to a pollster who irked him. When he was only 32,
his aggressive fundraising helped Bill Clinton win the presidency. At a
dinner afterwards, while others celebrated, he snatched up a steak knife
and started plunging it into the table, naming his political enemies and
yowling ³Dead!² after each stab.

Some say Mr Emanuel learned to act tough to pre-empt the jeers he might
otherwise have attracted as a schoolboy ballet dancer in Chicago. (He
was good‹his mother was apparently upset when he turned down a
scholarship to the Joffrey Ballet school.) Be that as it may, his style
seems to work. ³Rahmbo², as he is known, is skilled not only at
squeezing money out of donors (if the pledge is too small, he lets them
know), but also at making sure that the candidates who get it campaign
effectively. He makes them sign agreements specifying how many
appearances and fund-raising phone calls they will make. He approaches
his job ³with the sensibility of a Mob bookie², gushed a profile in
Rolling Stone last year.

Next week Mr Emanuel will publish his answer to Mr Gingrich's ³Contract
with America², the small-government manifesto that helped Republicans
capture the House in 1994. It is called ³The Plan: Big Ideas for
America², and is co-written with Bruce Reed, an old chum from the
Clinton White House. It has signs of being written in a hurry. Was
America in the 1950s and 1960s ³a land of opportunity and certainty², as
he tells us on page 31? Or has it ³always been a land of opportunity,
not certainty², as he says 11 pages later? The obligatory Bush-bashing
is stale and waffly: ³Bush inherited the longest economic boom in
history and gave the middle class the highest anxiety in memory.² But
the Plan itself is solid and mostly sensible.

Probably the main reason wages have not risen much in recent years is
that health-insurance premiums, which many American employers shoulder,
have soared. The Plan lists ways to curb them. Doctors, rather than
being paid for every test and injection they provide‹an arrangement that
inevitably leads to over-doctoring‹should be paid by results. Patients
should be given better incentives to stay healthy: insurers, for
example, should push them to take free physical exams to spot ailments
early. Better use of information technology could supposedly save $162
billion a year. If the system is made more efficient, Mr Emanuel thinks
coverage can be extended to all American children. But he concedes that
a nation as individualistic as America will probably never accept a
European-style national health service‹and he should know, having worked
on Hillary Clinton's doomed health project in the 1990s. He argues,
however, that maybe, some day, every American might receive a voucher
for basic health services from the insurer of his or her choice.

Mindful of the teachers' unions, he avoids the V-word when discussing
education. But he has some sensible ideas. Subsidies for those who
cannot afford to go to college are currently too complex; he would
replace the five main schemes with a single $3,000-a-year tax credit.
Teachers should be paid for performance, not just credentials. And
schoolchildren should take shorter holidays. (The Democratic Leadership
Council, a moderate Clintonian body, made the same proposal last month.)

Americans are not saving enough for retirement. Well, some are. Mr
Emanuel, after six years as a White House aide, earned $16m in two and a
half years as an investment banker. For those who lack his quick wits
and fat Rolodex, however, he proposes other ways to build up wealth.
Employees should automatically be enrolled in 401(K) pension schemes
unless they object. The middle class should be exempt from capital-gains
tax. And families with an income of less than $100,000 a year should
surrender no more than 10% of it to the taxman. As a congressman, Mr
Emanuel has proved himself something of a tax wonk, co-sponsoring a plan
to do to the tax code's complexities what he once fantasised about doing
to his political enemies.

Perhaps the most arresting part of the Plan concerns national security,
the Democrats' perennial weak spot. Again echoing Senator Clinton, he
wants 100,000 more soldiers for America's overstretched army. He also
wants an elite agency to fight domestic terrorism, like Britain's MI5.
Of George Bush's Department of Homeland Security, he scoffs: ³[It] has
180,000 employees. The London bombings in July 2005 were the work of
four men with backpacks. Whose organisation chart would you rather
have?² Most radically, he wants all Americans aged 18-25 to undergo
three months of compulsory disaster-training.
Oh come, come, Emanuel

Wouldn't it be more efficient to hire more professionals‹paramedics,
firemen and so forth? Not in Mr Emanuel's view. He does not want merely
to prepare for future disasters; he thinks his ³universal citizen
service² will bring youngsters of all backgrounds together and teach
them what it means to be American. ³The French abandoned the idea [of
national service] a decade ago, and now watch their young people riot in
the streets,² he says. This is a feeble explanation for the French
riots. And Mr Emanuel's scheme will remind many Americans that the
Democratic Party likes social engineering more than they do.

As a whole, the Plan will help rebut the charge that the Democrats have
no ideas. And if they win in November, they can always ditch the more
radical parts. A Plan is less binding than a Contract, and Mr Emanuel is
not the Democrats' leader in the House. At least, not yet."
--


We cannot expect the Americans to jump from capitalism to Communism,
but we can assist their elected leaders in giving Americans small
doses of socialism until they suddenly awake to find they have Communism."
- Soviet Leader Nikita Khrushchev, 1959

On Nov 6, 10:13*am, "dbu." <nos...@nobama.com> wrote:
> In article <tbGQk.240959$4p1.113...@en-nntp-09.dc1.easynews.com>,
>

"This is a feeble explanation for the French
riots."

I agree wholeheartedly.

dennis
in nca

Bush tried bipartensship his first year in office and ended up simply bowing
the Dims and spending more money


"Mark" <bogusmailmark@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:b0217a4a-b4a1-4c41-81be-9bec9560dc93@o40g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
Absolutely, Democrat bipartisanship only extends to the RINOs. It's
about time the Republicans took a similar view of the world.


On Nov 6, 7:35 am, "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolfer...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> Bipartisanship is only when you compromise to them, not the other way
> around.
>
> --
> The more things change, the more they remain the same. ~ Alphonse Karr-
> Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

"dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>> >
>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>> >>
>> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>> >
>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
>> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>> >
>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>> >
>> >(from
>> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>> >
>> >Another such map is here:
>> >
>> >
>> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>> >
>> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>> >
>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>
>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
>> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
>> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>
> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves me
> wondering how
> bipartisan the obama administration will be.


That information is already in today's news. Instead of watching TV, you
might want to have someone read to you. Obama's already talking about
Republicans in his administration.

Me thinks you should have said RINOs in his administration. There is not
such thing as a Republican socialist LOL



"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:LBKQk.1$aj1.0@newsfe01.iad...
> "dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
> news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
>> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>>> >>
>>> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>>> >
>>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
>>> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>>> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>>> >
>>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>>> >
>>> >(from
>>> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>>> >
>>> >Another such map is here:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>>> >
>>> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>>> >
>>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>>
>>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
>>> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
>>> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>>
>> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves
>> me wondering how
>> bipartisan the obama administration will be.
>
>
> That information is already in today's news. Instead of watching TV, you
> might want to have someone read to you. Obama's already talking about
> Republicans in his administration.
>

Who are you referring to? Be very specific. Use people's names.


"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote in message
news:wIWdnVlkzbFw5I7UnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@ptd.net...
> Me thinks you should have said RINOs in his administration. There is not
> such thing as a Republican socialist LOL
>
>
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:LBKQk.1$aj1.0@newsfe01.iad...
>> "dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
>> news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
>>> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
>>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>>>> >>
>>>> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>>>> >
>>>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>>>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>>>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
>>>> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>>>> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>>>> >
>>>> >(from
>>>> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>>>> >
>>>> >Another such map is here:
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>>>> >
>>>> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>>>> >
>>>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>>>
>>>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>>>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
>>>> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
>>>> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>>>
>>> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves
>>> me wondering how
>>> bipartisan the obama administration will be.
>>
>>
>> That information is already in today's news. Instead of watching TV, you
>> might want to have someone read to you. Obama's already talking about
>> Republicans in his administration.
>>
>
>

Do you own homework, uncle Tom

"JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
news:uSKQk.4$aj1.3@newsfe01.iad...
> Who are you referring to? Be very specific. Use people's names.
>
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote in message
> news:wIWdnVlkzbFw5I7UnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@ptd.net...
>> Me thinks you should have said RINOs in his administration. There is not
>> such thing as a Republican socialist LOL
>>
>>
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> news:LBKQk.1$aj1.0@newsfe01.iad...
>>> "dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
>>> news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
>>>> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
>>>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>>>>> >
>>>>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>>>>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>>>>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more
>>>>> >realistic
>>>>> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>>>>> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>>>>> >
>>>>> >(from
>>>>> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Another such map is here:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>>>>
>>>>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>>>>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
>>>>> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
>>>>> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>>>>
>>>> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves
>>>> me wondering how
>>>> bipartisan the obama administration will be.
>>>
>>>
>>> That information is already in today's news. Instead of watching TV, you
>>> might want to have someone read to you. Obama's already talking about
>>> Republicans in his administration.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

I've done my homework. I see no examples of what you are hallucinating
about. Provide names. If your next response contains no names, it will be
correctly assumed that you are drunker than usual (and for good reason), you
decrepit old pile of dust.


"Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote in message
news:D7ednWUkdaR74I7UnZ2dnUVZ_ojinZ2d@ptd.net...
> Do you own homework, uncle Tom
>
> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
> news:uSKQk.4$aj1.3@newsfe01.iad...
>> Who are you referring to? Be very specific. Use people's names.
>>
>>
>> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote in message
>> news:wIWdnVlkzbFw5I7UnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@ptd.net...
>>> Me thinks you should have said RINOs in his administration. There is
>>> not such thing as a Republican socialist LOL
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>>> news:LBKQk.1$aj1.0@newsfe01.iad...
>>>> "dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
>>>>> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
>>>>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>>>>>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>>>>>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more
>>>>>> >realistic
>>>>>> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>>>>>> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >(from
>>>>>> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Another such map is here:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>>>>>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban
>>>>>> areas
>>>>>> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now
>>>>>> we'll
>>>>>> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick
>>>>> leaves me wondering how
>>>>> bipartisan the obama administration will be.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That information is already in today's news. Instead of watching TV,
>>>> you might want to have someone read to you. Obama's already talking
>>>> about Republicans in his administration.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 18:13:35 -0500, JoeSpareBedroom wrote:

> Who are you referring to? Be very specific. Use people's names.


LOL! *YOU* telling others to be specific!!!!!!!


A HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




>
>
> "Mike Hunter" <mikehunt2@lycos/com> wrote in message
> news:wIWdnVlkzbFw5I7UnZ2dnUVZ_v_inZ2d@ptd.net...
>> Me thinks you should have said RINOs in his administration. There is not
>> such thing as a Republican socialist LOL
>>
>>
>>
>> "JoeSpareBedroom" <newstrash@frontiernet.net> wrote in message
>> news:LBKQk.1$aj1.0@newsfe01.iad...
>>> "dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
>>> news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
>>>> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
>>>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>>>>> >
>>>>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>>>>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>>>>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
>>>>> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>>>>> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>>>>> >
>>>>> >(from
>>>>> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Another such map is here:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>>>>
>>>>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>>>>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
>>>>> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
>>>>> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>>>>
>>>> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves
>>>> me wondering how
>>>> bipartisan the obama administration will be.
>>>
>>>
>>> That information is already in today's news. Instead of watching TV, you
>>> might want to have someone read to you. Obama's already talking about
>>> Republicans in his administration.
>>>
>>
>>

On Thu, 06 Nov 2008 09:54:29 -0800, Truckdude wrote:

>
> "dbu." <nospam@nobama.com> wrote in message
> news:nospam-7AFF6D.06221006112008@feeder.motzarella.org...
>> In article <xn0fxcfwxyt4pa000@reader.motzarella.org>,
>> "badgolferman" <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> larry moe 'n curly wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >Hachiroku $B%O%A%m%/(B wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Pretty friggin' close...
>>> >>
>>> >> http://i85.photobucket.com/albums/k7...own/2008-1.jpg
>>> >
>>> >That map is misleading to most people because it displays states
>>> >according to area, and a lot of landlocked states in the west have
>>> >large geographic areas but small populations. To get a more realistic
>>> >view of the votes, look at the lower map here, which displays states
>>> >proportionally to their electoral vote counts:
>>> >
>>> > http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3154/...52c2c0a6_o.jpg
>>> >
>>> >(from
>>> >http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/ame...08/7697829.stm)
>>> >
>>> >Another such map is here:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/...edblue1024.png
>>> >
>>> >Many maps of the 2008 election can be seen at:
>>> >
>>> > http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2008/
>>>
>>> The maps at the bottom of the page are the ones that show the real
>>> breakdown of voters. Once again it was the relatively few urban areas
>>> that overwhelmingly went Democrat. Regardless, B.O. won and now we'll
>>> have to pay for the ignorance of the electorate.
>>
>> I see he selected Rahm Emanuel as his chief of staff. That pick leaves me
>> wondering how
>> bipartisan the obama administration will be.
>> --
>>
>
> Geez! It's only been a day! Chill.

I particularly enjoyed the videos of Pelosi, Reid and a couple other party
wonks rejoicing at the news of Obama's election...