![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
| 7th Generation Celica (ZZT230/ZZT231) [2000-2005] |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Tech
![]() Location: Georgia
Posts: 34
Join Date: Dec 2007
Last On: 08-23-2008 10:04 AM
Vehicle: 2003 Celica gt
|
17's or 18's?
I am about to be getting a fairly large check for a slight damage done to my car and I was planning on getting some black wheels with a chrome lip for the car. I drive a 2003 gt and i was wonderin would the 17's or the 18's look better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
SnowManGT
![]() Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 15
Join Date: Nov 2007
Last On: 04-25-2008 11:49 AM
Vehicle: Celica GT
|
Re: 17's or 18's?
18's are a good choice but you will feel every bump. Either way, you will need a drop or else your ride will look like a 4x4.
__________________
![]() ![]() Mods: Nothin but an S2K antenna, PPE Race Header, INVIDIA exhaust, Injen CAI, APR fr. bar, Megan rear bar, OEM carbon hood & 18" WedsSport's... so far!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
![]() Location: Chicago
Posts: 48
Join Date: Nov 2007
Last On: 06-10-2008 11:12 PM
|
Re: 17's or 18's?
nd i got 18" on it looks sweet man exsept i got an invader body kit on it and my car is droped ... if you got no body kit and you heavent lowered you car down yet .. like the dude above me said it will def look like a 4x4 lol .. if you go no body kit go with 17"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
it was all a dream
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 9,863,211
Join Date: Oct 2003
Last On: 07-18-2008 09:59 AM
Vehicle: 91 MR2 Turbo
2nd Vehicle: 96 Civic Hatch
|
Re: 17's or 18's?
17's are both more practical and great looking.
18's are less practical and usually look out of place on a non-kitted car. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|